Modern Approaches to Comparative Politics

Buddy
0
Modern Approaches to Comparative Politics
Modern Approaches to Comparative Politics

Behavioural Approach

Focuses on observing, recording, and analyzing human behavior to understand politics. Systematic, empirical, positivist; separates value from fact.

Charles Merriam, Graham Wallas, Arthur Bentley

Eight characteristics (David Easton): Regularities, Verification, Techniques, Quantification, Values, Systematization, Pure Science, Integration

Post-behaviouralism: Rejects value-neutrality; holistic, interpretive, contextual, policy-relevant.

Political System Approach

Views political system as interrelated institutions, activities, actors, and processes interacting with society. Influenced by Biology and General Systems Theory.

David Easton (father), Gabriel Almond, Morton Kaplan, Karl Deutsch, Talcott Parsons

Inputs: Demands & Support. Output: Laws, rules, regulations, judicial decisions. Structural-functionalism derived from system approach; 'Black Box' model.

Structural-Functional Approach

Studies political systems as structures fulfilling essential functions for stability and continuity.

Gabriel Almond, G.C. Powell

Structures: legislature, executive, judiciary, bureaucracy, political parties. Functions: lawmaking, policy implementation, adjudication, socialization.

Interdependence & Equilibrium: structures are interconnected; aim to maintain system stability. Criticism: status quoist, static, Eurocentric.

Political Culture Approach

Studies attitudes, values, beliefs, and orientations of people toward politics.

Gabriel Almond, Sydney Verba, Rajni Kothari, Morris Jones, Fred Riggs

3 Orientations: Cognitive, Affective, Evaluative. Civic Culture: combination of parochial, subject, participative. Focus on political socialization and cultural pluralism.

Criticism: Determinism, static, vague, methodological challenges.

New Institutionalism

Analyzes the role of institutions (both hard and soft) in shaping political behavior, linked to socio-cultural context.

James March & Johan Olsen, Douglas North, Paul Pierson, William Scott

Variants: Rational Choice (logic of instrumentality), Sociological/Cultural (logic of appropriateness). Includes informal norms, values, practices. Historical-path-dependent perspective.

Modernization Theory

Emerging 1960s-70s. Advocates following the development path of Western nations to achieve modernization.

Gabriel Almond, Lucian Pye, David Apter, James Coleman, Samuel Huntington

Focus: political development, capacity, equality, differentiation. Critique: US-centric, ignores local contexts.

Dependency Theory

Critiques modernization theory as Eurocentric; global capitalist system exploits developing countries.

Raúl Prebisch, Dos Santos, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Andre Gunder Frank, Immanuel Wallerstein

Core-periphery model, unequal exchange, Latin America as fertile ground. Progressive comparativists.

Elite Theory

Argues that a small minority (elites) hold political power while masses are mostly bystanders.

Gaetano Mosca, Vilfredo Pareto, C. Wright Mills, Robert Michels, Schumpeter, Ortega y Gasset, Karl Mannheim, Burnham

Concepts: Circulation of Elites, Iron Law of Oligarchy, Power Elites, Political Formula. Critiques democracy and pluralism.

Tags

Post a Comment

0Comments

Post a Comment (0)